<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>New Albany Public Schools - EdTribune MS - Mississippi Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for New Albany Public Schools. Data-driven education journalism for Mississippi. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://ms.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Mississippi District Chronic-Absence Rates Spanned 41.6 Points</title><link>https://ms.edtribune.com/ms/2026-07-14-ms-district-rate-spread/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ms.edtribune.com/ms/2026-07-14-ms-district-rate-spread/</guid><description>Mississippi&apos;s reported district chronic-absence rates covered a 41.6-percentage-point span in 2025.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Mississippi&apos;s reported district chronic-absence rates covered a 41.6-percentage-point span in 2025.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across 143 district rows, the lowest reported rate was 5.0% and the highest was 46.6%. The median was 26.7%, placing half of the district rates on either side of that midpoint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those endpoints make the variation visible, but they do not mean a student was many times as likely to be chronically absent merely because of a district boundary. The file reports district aggregates, not comparable odds for otherwise similar students, and the two rows at the minimum require a specific confidentiality caveat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/img/2026-07-14-ms-district-rate-spread-ranked.png&quot; alt=&quot;All Mississippi district chronic absenteeism rates ranked from low to high&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Seven rows were below 15%&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seven district rows reported rates below 15%. The &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/mdhs-division-of-youth-services&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;MDHS Division of Youth Services&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/mississippi-for-mathematics-and-science&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Mississippi School for Mathematics and Science&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; each appear at 5.0% in the analysis file, but both suppress enrollment and chronic-count fields.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MDE&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://mdek12.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2025/11/ChronicAbReport2024-25-2025-102125.pdf&quot;&gt;underlying table&lt;/a&gt; describes each rate as 5% or less.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That leaves 5 below-15% systems with known positive enrollment denominators. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/okolona-separate&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Okolona School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 10.3%, followed by &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/jefferson&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Jefferson County School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 13.8%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/east-jasper&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;East Jasper School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/new-albany&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;New Albany Public Schools&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/rankin&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Rankin County School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; each reported 14.2%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/img/2026-07-14-ms-district-rate-spread-low-tail.png&quot; alt=&quot;Mississippi district rows reporting chronic absenteeism below 15%&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suppressed rows belong in a distribution of published rate fields, but they cannot support student-count comparisons. That is why this analysis treats 5.0% as a reported lower boundary rather than evidence that those two special-purpose systems had the same number or share of affected students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The middle was broad, too&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The spread was not only a product of the minimum and maximum. The 10th-percentile district rate was 18.2%, while the 90th percentile was 38.9%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The middle half of district rates extended from 22.4% at the 25th percentile to 33.8% at the 75th percentile, an 11.4-point span. Those percentile markers show that substantial variation remained even after setting aside the most extreme rows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/img/2026-07-14-ms-district-rate-spread-percentiles.png&quot; alt=&quot;Selected percentiles of Mississippi district chronic absenteeism rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The upper tail was also larger than the lower one under the prespecified thresholds: 13 districts reported rates of at least 40%, compared with 7 below 15%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ms/districts/claiborne&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Claiborne County Public Schools&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; had the maximum reported district rate, 46.6%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What the distribution cannot explain&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district table identifies where reported rates differ; it does not identify why. District size, student composition, attendance reporting and local barriers are competing explanations that cannot be separated with these aggregate rows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Mississippi Department of Education&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://mdek12.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2025/11/ChronicAbReport2024-25-2025-102125.pdf&quot;&gt;chronic-absence report&lt;/a&gt; recommends responses including mentoring, family engagement, alternatives to suspension, personalized outreach and attention to health barriers. Those recommendations provide a menu for local investigation, not evidence that any one mechanism produced the spread in this analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This analysis uses MDE&apos;s 2024-25 district chronic-absence table, available through the department&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://mdek12.org/publicreporting/reports/&quot;&gt;public reporting archive&lt;/a&gt;. It uses all 143 rows with a published rate for rate-only comparisons and flags the 2 rows with suppressed denominators. The statewide summary does not reconcile to the district table, so this article makes no statewide numeric claim.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>